Subject: | Re: OT Bristol was Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype? |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:44:39 -0700 |
The Speedster looks more interesting to me. High exclusivity and
insanity factor. :-)
Moose Jeff Keller wrote: Hmm 350 lb.ft at idle ... "Even at tickover there is 350 lb.ft (476 Nm) available" "Even our "lead-footed" factory test drivers regularly return over 20 mpg." I don't think I have enough Zuikos to sell to raise the 200,000 GBP ... besides fighter sounds too aggressive. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Metz 60 CT-4 Question, John A. Lind |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Use of digital camera, Danrich |
Previous by Thread: | OT Bristol was Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?, Jeff Keller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-1 lenses resolution vs. conventional lenses - fact or hype?, ll . clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |