Subject: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer |
---|---|
From: | reganconley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:47:19 -0500 (GMT-05:00) |
Nevermind. Found the answer on the OM-FAQ: "Due to the semi-silvered mirrors in the OM-{2S, 3(Ti), 4(Ti), and PC} you must use a circular polarizer with them, otherwise your exposures will be off by 2-3 stops. The OM-{1(N), 2(N), 10, G, and F) do not have a semi-silvered mirror, and can thus use linear polarizers without any problem." < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Linear vs. Circular polarizer, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |