Can't we call this an OT now?
XDan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John A. Lind
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:38 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Demise of a Landmark
At 07:51 AM 10/9/03, Piers wrote:
>I believe some are still used for natural gas, to meet unusually
'peaky'
>local demand. There are some not far away which seem to move, and we
are
>definitely not using "town gas".
The ones here were for natural gas . . . although you could use one for
"coal gas" (as extracted from coal) and for the exact reason Piers
mentioned. The pipelines at the time could not meet peak demands from
several major industrial users.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|