Speaking of films, as I have been "out of it" for awhile (many will say I'm
PERMANENTLY out of it in many areas), what are opinions of Agfachromes? I used
to really like them, but distribution in NA was, uhm, not good. Canada (at
least Southern Ontario) seemed better than the US, but then I think it got bad
there, too.
Also, what I hear is that colour negative films have improved greatly and that
for some publications, negatives are now du jour. Is that the case?
Earl aka Canoeman
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/23/2003 at 12:40 PM Mike wrote:
>>
>>
>>I seem to like the slight warmth from the 81A filter matches the cooler
>>Fuji films quite well.. I'm rather pleased with it.. Can I leave it on
>>permanently instead of my UV filter? What situations would that not be
>>good?
>>
>>Albert
>>
>Not good would be low angle early morning or evening with lots of red
>already. IMO If you process your photos in Photoshop there is little
>reason to use any of the mild color correction filters. They might do
>more harm than good in front of your expensive glass. Exceptions might
>include a polarizer or correcting for a specific color such as
>florescent lighting or high altitude UV. If you think fuji is too cool
>why not try something else?
>
>Mike
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|