Re: [OM] Nope, It missed it by few hundred miles

[Timpe, Jim]

-----Original Message-----
>From: julian_davies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>
>Subject: Re: [OM] Nope, It missed it by few hundred miles
>
>
>I never said that film aliased. I asserted that the 
>requirement to limit lens resolution was not new to digital. 
>This assertion you can believe or disbelieve. Your choice.
>
>For accuracy, aliasing is not a phenomenon which "appeared 
>when people began using computers to extract information". 
>It's much older than that.
>

On a more (moiré?) serious note, this article is an interesting read on the
subject.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Grain.htm#whatis

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >