Subject: | Re: [OM] New E-1 |
---|---|
From: | "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:14:04 -0700 |
Doesn't a focal reducer make the light rays less perpendicular to the image plane? ... Just the opposite of what the digital lenses are trying to accomplish. Even so a long focal length lens has light rays that could probably be bent. Does the focal plane move? A telescope eyepiece rack can often move an eyepiece pretty long distances. -jeff I've never used one and it's been at least a couple decades since I read about them. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Here's a thought for an adapter with an optical element. Has anyone > considered a focal reducer? I've never seen one for a camera lens. All > we get are tele-extenders. But owners of Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes > from Celestron and Meade should be familiar with them. The Celestron > focal reducer will take my 2000mm f/10 and turn it into a 1000mm f/5 > with a reduced diameter image circle. How about an OM focal reducer that > turns your 50mm f/1.8 into a 25mm f/0.9 and compresses all of the larger > image circle onto your 4/3 sensor. OK, where's the catch? > > Chuck Norcutt > Woburn, Massachusetts, USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Digital Rebel *is* flexible, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] e-1 vs. om, C.H.Ling-Accura |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] New E-1, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] New E-1, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |