I'm right metaphysically - John is undoubtedly right physically.:-) As I
said earlier, what I am calling shutter lag undoubtedly has to do with
the time it takes that af to hunt for the focal point in dim light - I'm
counting shutter release time from the time I depress the shutter to
capture an image - not from a half-depressed, focused, point.
B. D,
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:50 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] New E-1
In <002f01c37939$5a74d9d0$3e23fea9@ccasony01>, on 09/12/03
at 10:22 AM, "bdcolen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> So if I say I
>can't detect any shutter lag - which God knows I suffered with with the
>E-20, I don't. If I say that images shot at 3200 are extremely noisy -
>they are. ;-)
You say there was shutter lag with the E-20. John H. says there is no
shutter lag with either the E-10 or E-20.
Who's right? Or are you both right.
What was that I read about metaphysics?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
-----------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|