Yes, Andrew, they are. My Dad was a Marine and, true to form,
"four-sheets-to-the-wind" on his wedding day. The photog did a great job of
organizing the "cats who would not be herded" and the photgraphs are great.
Jamie
Fort Myers, FL
----- Original Message -----
From: "andrew fildes" <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats
The key point here is the frame numbers. It was customary to cut roll
film into single frames and pop them in a little glassite bag with
the prints, at this time, especially with negs this size where the
standard print would be a contact print.
It's a big roll though - I'd guess Kodak 122 - as used in the old
Autographic folders or something of similar size. Not what a pro
would use though - are they professional shots?
AndrewF
>Jamie,
>Sounds like 9x12cm, the european counterpart of 4x5in.
>Regards, Moisés
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jamie Costello [mailto:jcostel1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Lunes, 08 de Septiembre de 2003 03:08 p.m.
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats
>
>
>I just was given a set of B&W negatives (my parents' 1954 wedding) that are
>in a format I don't readily recognize. The actual image is approx. 3"x4"
>and the negatie size is approx. 3 1/4 x 4 3/8. Each is marked "Kodak
Safety
>Film" and has a frame number. There are no sprocket holes and no film type
>designation.
>
>Any ideas as to film type and format? Thanks.
>
>Jamie
>Fort Myers, FL
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|