Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: Shift Lens |
---|---|
From: | andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:40:55 +1000 |
> Anyway, what was all that nonsense about the 50mm as being the'natural' view - it's the 16mm fish that best mimics the eye surely? 180deg. field, centre point of interest, distorted periphery - perfect! Just hold the print one centimetre from the nose for best realistic effect. AndrewFI think the human eye spans about 130 degrees 'across the frame' (that's my eyepall opinion <g>) so I think maybe a 12-15mm rectlinear lens more approximates the 'human-eye' view. Also, the human brain corrects the linear distortion 'in software' so we don't perceive the straight lines as curved. Ah, so that's why I bought the Heliar! AndrewF < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats, andrew fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats, Roger D. Key |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Shift Lens, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Shift Lens, Julian Davies |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |