Subject: | Re: [OM] velvia .. ISO 50 or ISO 40? |
---|---|
From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:51:23 EDT |
In a message dated 9/8/2003 10:24:37 AM Central Standard Time, Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > I've tried shooting Velvia both ways and frankly the difference is > too subtle for my eyes to see any difference . . . and some rate it at 64. Guess it depends on your eye, your equipment and your taste. By the way, I've shot a bit of the new Velvia 100F at to my eye it is great. Bill Barber |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 85/f2 SC or 100/f2.8 MC?, Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OT] was (incorrectly)Re: [OM] Re: Big RAM, julian_davies |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] velvia .. ISO 50 or ISO 40?, Geilfuss Charles |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] velvia .. ISO 50 or ISO 40?, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |