I find a slightly different situation. I shoot many, many more frames with
digital. At the end of the day, though, I likely have fewer frames than I
would using film. I delete as I shoot with digital. I delete after I shoot
with film.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] E-20 Question
> The odd thing I've found is that when shooting digital I shoot FEWER,
> rather than more images. On most of my jobs, which involve a long day of
> simply being a fly on the wall, I will shoot anywhere from 15 to 25
> rolls of b&w film. With digital I find myself shooting as few as 90
> frames. My guess is that this is a result of my looking at what I've
> shot, deciding I have the shot I need, and then holding back from
> shooting - which is not a good thing. I've heard that National
> Geographic is telling photographers shooting digital to literally tape
> over the LCD on the camera back, and I can understand this, though I
> don't know that I'd go that far. But I think that the closer one can
> come to thinking of a digital camera as 'just another camera,' albeit
> one loaded with slide, rather than negative film, the better off one
> will be.
>
> B. D.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|