I think the heavy sharpen will be done during printing, the one record on CD
will only do a minor sharpen. Different setting is needed for printing and
viewing, it is a common practice, just like the super heavy sharpen needed
for offset printing. BTW, the scan doesn't look good on my monitor, it is
flat and with highlight details lost.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Siddiq" <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 22:51:11 -0400, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
<lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> i dunno where you chaps are getting oversharpened film scans, but the fuji
> frontier 390 (latest) machine i get scans onto cd from seems to do a good
> job--unless i am missing the severe sharpening artifact.
>
> linked below a fullsize, untouched, raw scan from CD. 1600*1200 pixels, a
> smidgen under 3Mb large, so either patience or broadband is required. film
> was fuji npz (800 speed). 200/4 zuik wide open @ 1/60sec , T32 full dump,
> approx 70ft range.
>
> pretty decent or junk?
>
> http://users2.ev1.net/~wesiddiquis/siddiq/R1-16.jpg
>
> in the process of uploading, should be up by quarter past 9 pacific time.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
