Moose -
Thanks for the post, but realized you were caught in the maelstrom
minus a nail for the shoe! Send this off-list to avoid any more
convolutions.
You confused!!!!! Where do think I am!!!!! And at the point where i
QUIT in the wee hours, I could not even focus on what or IF I was
writing trying to mellow the yellow!!!!! And all that from just
contrite self-evident statements of fact.......... WOW what an
awesome POLITICIAN I would have been :^)))))). Just did not anticipate
breaking of the thread when i worded in a 'cryptic' and efficient
manner. PLUS.....
Did discover one issue which is generic to email, but surfaced in that
round robin. My original post used quotation marks around
"inconsistency" as cited by Guinn. In the style of list
communications threaded for context, that should have sufficed.
Somehow (and I know it happens on an unpredictable basis) cybervoid
stripped the " " marks. No wonder you thought I had lost my mind in
the absence of quote marks. I would have read it that way also.
Whether this was before or after Lee did a bad snippet job on the
thread, is moot. Except for Gwinn, we are all saying the same thing.
I just distilled into simple punch lines which for the want of a nail
(quote marks) the shoe was lost............
Oh well......
On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 05:19 PM, Moose wrote:
Sorry I attributed some comments to you rather than the originator.
All that interlaced text apparently confused me. And then I did the
same thing. :-)
Moose
whunter wrote:
Quick clarification:
Basically, none of my comments can be isolated from context of reply
to the post of Gwinn despite having been discarded again.
Appreciated,
Bill
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|