Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] SC vs MC zuikos

Subject: Re: [OM] SC vs MC zuikos
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:00:30 -0400
Thank you!
----------------------------------------------------
John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
mail:  omtech@xxxxxxxxx
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121  Turnaround 4-5 weeks
----------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] SC vs MC zuikos


> I believe everything you have stated is correct. No 55/1.2 MC, no 75-150
MC,
> etc.
>
> Tom
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] SC vs MC zuikos
>
>
> > Can someone confirm that there was a 55 1.2 MC.  I thought that even
> though
> > the front ring is black, they were all SC.  As I understand it, all
> 75-150s
> > (even with black from ring) are SC. I also thought that all 135 3.5s
were
> > SC.
> > While I do have two parts listings for the `135 3.5, (type 1 and 2),
they
> > both have the same front element, part number LC6048. Both parts list
show
> > the lens as an E-Zuiko, which would indicate SC.
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz