I just got that issue today and haven't read the article yet. There is a
lot more to it than is on the web page. My past experience has been that
PCmag differs considerably in their ratings from more traditional
photography resources. I don't weight them very heavily. Pop Photo is
better and dpreview.com is far the best because of all the test images
they provide for making one's own evaluations.
Moose
Jeff Keller wrote:
Interesting that neither of the two editors choices rate that high in their "Image
Quality: Jury Test".
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|