From a non-Zuikoholic viewpoint, all the substitutions seem reasonable
except one. If making nature macro shots, auto tubes on a regular lens
is a fine solution. For flat subjects, it will be less satiafactory than
the 50/3.5.
Moose
Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu wrote:
Oly content: Only one body in the Lama stable: OM-PC to be complemented from
the list below. None is slower than f/2.8 and all of
them are sharp enough to use wide open. One by one I've sold all of my Zuikos
(except for the 50mm f/1.8 MiJ !!) for less
expensive, faster, or sometimes sharper lenses. I'm not saying I'm always
right and it might be Scales Syndrome: I like to see 'em
come and go. You be the judge:
Zuiko 135 f3.5 -> Tamron f/2.5
Zuiko 100 f2.8 -> 90mm Series1 f/2.5 macro
Zuiko 50 f1.4 -> Zuiko 50 f1.8 MiJ
Zuiko 50 f3.5 macro -> auto tubes
Zuiko 28 f2 -> Tamron 2.8 (don't miss the faster one)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|