I shant argue semantics. I was once 'corrected' by a registrar from one of
the European houses that did assessments. His point was that it WASN'T an
acronym. That was my sole point.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kennedy McEwen
>Subject: Re: [OM] TOPE 14 Moose' pic (SO, ISO)
>
>
>In article , "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes
>>http://www.business-to-business-resources.com/Business/Interna
tional_Bu
>sines
>s_and_Trade/ISO/
>Read the first paragraph.
>
I did and the same, or similar information is present on the site I
provided - none of which changes the fact that your initial statement
below is still wrong: there certainly *IS* an International Standards
Organisation" - irrespective of what "ISO" is derived from - and the
folks there certainly are not a figment of our imagination.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|