Is it really possible/feasible to mount the 38/2.8 directly on the
camera body? I should try that...
--thomas
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:33:31 -0400
"Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks to me like the 38/2.8 mounted directly on the camera. And
> the "swivel attachment" is just an itty-bitty ball head. I've got
> a rig a lot like this.
>
> Walt
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:25:36 -0700
>
> >OK This time I scanned a picture of the author of the photo
> >article on caterpillers and her setup from the June 2003 issue. I
> >recognize the T28 and Power Control and the mounting ring on the
> >camera but what is that swivel attachment on which the covered
> >T28 on the left is mounted? And is that a 38/2.8? Is it mounted
> >to the 65~116? It doesn't look like it protrudes far enough from
> >the body to be on the 65~116. In any event she captured some nice
> pictures. (Darlyne Murawski)
> >
> >http://www.interisland.net/watershed/mike/natlG1.jpg
> >
> >Mike
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://voop.free.fr/
------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
