Your pictures are nice Richard. The Leicophile seems to have chosen
the wrong light/time of day.
Chris
On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 04:29 Europe/London, Richard F. Man
wrote:
At 10:30 AM 7/23/2003 +0800, C.H.Ling-Accura wrote:
Richard, you got some much better picts then the other Leica guy! his
tree
just look pale.
*blush* Thanks! I know I got a good one when my daughter, upon seeing
the dye sub print, asked if she can have it. This is the first and
only time she has done so!!
For the first guess from the framing and out of focus background, I
thought
IMG19 is from 90/2 and IMG31 is from 35/1.4. But... I think there
must be
some trick as you post this question. OK, I bet IMG36 is from 35/1.4
and the
other is from 90/2 :-)
No trick, it is so obvious that I have to ask :-) img19 and img36 are
OM 90/2 and img31 is M7.
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|