At 06:54 AM 7/17/03, Joel Wilcox wrote:
This is what Peter Kolonia wrote in PP (have the article before
me): "Velvia 50, however, trumped the competition [between Velvia 100F
and E100VS] in resolving power, with the ability to distinguish 81 line
pairs per millimeter (lp/mm) in our resolution tests, compared to 72 lp/mm
for both Velvia 100F and E100VS. Is this significant? Probably not for
general photography, but it could be a factor in mural-sized enlargements"
(PP, Aug 2003, p. 66).
John, where do you see the potential for ambiguity?
Joel W.
Mea Culpa . . . it was a portion of the thread that was inadvertently
snipped out, and it wasn't written by you. I had to read it several times
to understand it . . . not that I haven't written some things that later
reading told me would be difficult to understand:
For example, Provia100F is fine grain than Velvia 50 but Velvia has more
resolution (e.g. can capture more details). The Velvia 100F was a step in
the right direction for the "best" film, I guess.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|