| Subject: | Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:38:18 -0700 |
I only suggested the were the same in regards to 'B', but different as
to Auto Mode.
Moose Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote: And there IS a difference between plain 2 and 2N on this matter, stated at esif. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] OTnow, was Put the blame where it is.., Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 50-250s, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM is best for astrophotography, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |