No need to feel embarrassed. Congrats.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mickey Trageser [mailto:vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:53 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BIN $60 Re: [OM] 50~250 Tokina
Oh Crap! Sorry guys, I wasn't following the thread when I saw the listing.
I've lusted for that 5x zoom and couldn't resist the BIN. I'm quite happy
with my Tokina 17mm and thought it would be a safe bet.
-Mickey (feeling somewhat emarassed...)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: BIN $60 Re: [OM] 50~250 Tokina
> And it looks like Mickey stole it!
>
> The thing that's sort of subliminally kept me away from these is the bad
> bokeh rep and the proof at one focal length that C.H. provided for the
> Zuiko 50-250. Anybody know if the Tokina is better? I'm sure I've heard
> speculation here that the 2 designs may be related.
>
> Moose
>
> Timpe, Jim wrote:
>
> >If the seller's description is accurate, that's a steal...
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|