Subject: | Re: [OM] Tamron 300/2.8 still cheap, but not meeting reserve... |
---|---|
From: | "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:41:39 -0400 |
As I recall, the only difference, except for the color, of course, is that the green ones are all metal and the gray ones are not. Walt ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Johnie Stafford <jms@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: 05 Jul 2003 08:49:31 -0500 > >What's the difference between the green and charcoal versions? > >Johnie > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Tamron 300/2.8 still cheap, but not meeting reserve..., Johnie Stafford |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Was Fireworks, turns into alcohol again, Boris Grigorov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron 300/2.8 still cheap, but not meeting reserve..., Johnie Stafford |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Tamron 300/2.8 still cheap, but not meeting reserve..., Roger D. Key |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |