> -----Original Message-----
> they meant, you then land up with a very nice small camera (Leica
> like) and smaller lenses since
> they don't need to be retro-focus, but an electronic (read:
> difficult to manually focus)
> viewfinder.
>
I definitely will not invest on a DSLR without a good optical viewfinder!
Will never consider a electronic one.
> Somebody on this list mentioned that the Foveon sensor has a low
> pixel count. This is not really
> true, since Foveon counts a vertically stacked R+G+B "pixel" as
> one pixel while everybody else
> counts their R,G,B pixels individually. What is stored to disk is
> usually interpolated data still
> further muddying the "resolution". For illustration a 3Meg
> Foveon chip would have 9Meg sensor
> pixels in everybody elses counting system, so they are at the
> higher end of resolution/pixel
> count. I would hate to be in Foveon's marketing dept and have to
> explain this everyday!
Check the reviews is better listen to what the manufacturer said, I got trap
by the Micr*tek sales people and bought a 6700 scanner that actually worth
1/3 of it price! Imaging resource suggest the SD9's resolution is less than
other 6MP DSLR:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/SD9/SD9A12.HTM
C.H.Ling
>
> Regards,
> Tim hughes
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|