ML Archiv: RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?

Subject:	RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?
From:	"Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:53:49 -0700

And I'd take a 180/2 for a couple hundred myself...   

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Brokaw 
>Subject: Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?
>
>
>For that I'd buy another one... where are these secret 
>places...? Are there any $500 Leica M4's there? I want one of 
>those, too.
>-- 
>
>Jim Brokaw
>OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, (continued) Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Skip Williams Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, John Duggan Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, W Shumaker Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Stephen Troy Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Andrew Dacey Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Jim Brokaw RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Jamie Costello Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, VS RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Timpe, Jim <=

Previous by Date:	[OM] Need advice on shooting under fluorescents, Gary M. Teller
Next by Date:	[OM] OM-2S Meter Died, Doggre
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, VS
Next by Thread:	[OM] In print, Sam Shiell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]