Subject: | RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T? |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jun 2003 07:40:30 -0700 |
He'd need the 3"T" for full synchro. The plain 3 doesn't support that. Kick in an additional 6~700USD for that little letter on the end... >-----Original Message----- >From: Stylianos Georgakis >Subject: Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T? > > >Hello there, So I propose the OM-4 >unless you need the F280 full synchro flash. > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Stylianos Georgakis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, John Hudson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?, Jim Brokaw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |