Subject: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron |
---|---|
From: | "Garry D. Lewis" <erind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:20:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Walt announced- >and if it gets dropped over a cliff or eaten by a bear, it will >cost about a third as much to replace. Is that with or without the camera that was attached? With or without the cost of x-rays and veternarian surgery? yours accounting the days, Garry ===== Elephant? What Elephant? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Walt Wayman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Timpe, Jim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Walt Wayman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 90/2 Zuiko vs. 90/2.8 Tamron, Albert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |