Hey, that's nothing. My old Vivitar 28/2.5 from the 70s takes a 72mm
filter. At least it's a common size, although big and pricy. I never had
any filters for it back then.
All the Zuiko 28s, including the f2.0, take 49mm filters, but I couldn't
afford them back then.
Moose
Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu wrote:
Let me get this straight. This lens is a 28mm f/2.8 with a 67mm filter
ring???? What the heck were those boys smoking when they
designed that one? Or maybe in 1972, Dilbert's manager approached the
designers like this:
"We have some parts lying around that we need to use up. If we put a big front
on a modest lens will it look more impressive? The
machine shop has a surplus of 67mm rings from our canceled contracts with
Howitzer......"
The Zuiko 28/2.8 is what? 49mm? I know my 3.5 was.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|