The lowest EV would be 8 hours at f/5.6, ISO 100.
So I sounds as if that meter can do it.
You might have similarly low EV's for pinhole photography, as well,
so I suppose there would be demand for EV readings that low.
Reciprocity failure is a very important consideration for astrophotography.
(BTW I had to consider RF for both long durations and short durations on my NM
shoot!)
Some slide films have extremely low RF. E200 is one such example.
At 16:50 06/09/2003 +0100, Piers Hemy wrote:
>The Gossen Lunasix/Lunapro is so named because of its supposed ability ti
>meter in moonlight - the specs speak of metering from EV-4 which I think is
>8 hours at f/64 (though I can't speak from experience).
>
>However, before you jump in, perhaps a consideration of the reciprocity
>failure characteristics of the film in use would be in order - would the
>metering be of any better practical use than a 'rule of thumb'?
>
>Piers
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Matt BenDaniel
>Sent: 09 June 2003 15:03
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [OM] Star Trails
>
>
>At 10:19 06/09/2003 -0300, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>>...I understand that a professional standard requires both handheld
>>light metering and intuitive knowledge.
>
>Are there light meters than can accurately meter a scene or meter the sky in
>extremely dark nighttime conditions? Do such meters allow you to calculate
>aperture/duration when the duration may be 8 hours long?
--
Matt BenDaniel
matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://starmatt.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|