Subject: | RE: [OM] Hiking: 50/2 or 90/2? |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 9 Jun 2003 07:47:42 -0700 |
What's on the 'other' camera? Easy for me to answer, the 50/2... I don't have a 90/2 8^) -----Original Message----- From: Richard F. Man So question is if you can only bring one lens w/ your OM (plus another camera with its lens), would you take the 50/2 or the 90/2? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Hiking: 50/2 or 90/2?, Richard F. Man |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Star Trails, Matt BenDaniel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hiking: 50/2 or 90/2?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hiking: 50/2 or 90/2?, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |