Yes, I had earlier opined about an adaptall body with varous mount inserts
to accommodate any lens type. Seems too easy, too obvious. Won't happen...
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Om Voitlander
> Maybe Sigma will get tired of people skipping past their digital body
because of the Sigma-only mount.
>
> In my daydream, they invent an Adaptall-2-like non-mount receptacle.
Suddenly every Canon FD has a digital back. Every F mount
> Nikkor, going all the way back, has a digital back. Every manual focus
Rokkor has a digital back. Oh, yeah, suddenly Tom's
> collection of Zuiko super-teles pays off.
>
> And the moon is always full. And the Palestinians and Jews have a
peaceful border. Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants celebrate
> Christmas together everyday. And......
>
> Lama
> PS,
> How come I always have a migrane when I come home from the camera show?
>
>
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Certainly the OM2000 fits the general description. Perhaps the Bessaflex
> add some bells and whistles. In any case, I'm quite content with my OM
> film cameras and don't see much use in a new film Bessaflex-OM. What I
> want to know is where is the Bessaflex-OM Digital?
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|