On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:40:31 -0400
ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In <20030606182217.29887695.T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 06/06/03
> at 06:22 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >However surely, no filter must mean less degradation than any
> >filter :)
>
> Ah, but you didn't *test* that supposition!
>
Correct, but....
...read the qualifying statement just previous: I have not noticed
any degradation, which implies either that there is none, or that I
haven't been looking carefully enough.
--thomas
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|