Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] vivitar 19-35, again?

Subject: Re: [OM] vivitar 19-35, again?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 01:18:28 -0700
You didn't look very hard. This question comes up with great regularity. There are a number of threads in the archives. Here's my last post on the subject from all the way back on 5/12/03:

Moose
--------------------------------
"Joel, the 19-35/3.5-4.5 focuses in the same direction as a Zuiko, NOT like a Nikk*r.

There are 2 very different super-wide zooms that are sold under various brand names:

The 19-35/3.5-4.5 is a fairly recent design which uses plastic extensively. Although relatively large compared to any one of the Zuikos in the same fl/speed range, it is quite light at 345g/12.17oz. Mine is a Vivitar Series 1 and I know they are also sold under the Phoenix brand and very possibly under others.

The 18-28/4-4.5 is a slightly older design of predominantly metal construction weighing 477g/16.83oz. This is made by Samyang, but also sold under the Phoenix label in the past, and again, possibly others. It focuses the opposite way from Zuikos.

In prior threads about these 2 lenses, opinions about the 18-28 vary quite a lot, both as to optical quality and, to a lesser extent, about build quality. There are a lot of list members who equate metal construction with quality and reliablility and they generally dis the 19-35. A couple of listees have commented that their 19-35 feels like it won't last because of the plastic construction, but that it works perfectly so far and is good enough and cheap enough that they aren't worried. I don't recall any actual negative mechanical experiences with the 19-35 being posted.

Brian has posted magazine tests of these 2 and many other lenses on his site at <http://homepages.caverock.net.nz/0.000000E+00bj/zuiko/> . He has asked that this URL not be posted anywhere outside the list. Based on those tests the 19-35 appears to be the optically better lens. I have the 19-35 and am quite happy with it, but have never used the 18-28. "

gaasland@xxxxxxxx wrote:

I've searched the archive about this lens, just wondered if someone has 
recently tried it? I've been tempted to jump to Nikon and buy the 17-35/2.8, 
but I would have to sell my first-born and indenture myself for life! Thanks, 
John.




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz