But the 2S is less repairable....
How about the 40/PC?
tOM
On Friday, May 30, 2003 at 13:52
John Hermanson <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd say the 2S is no more or less reliable than a 4.
> _________________________________
> John Hermanson www.zuiko.com
> Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
> 21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
> 631-424-2121 For Free Olympus manuals,
> please call 1-800-221-3000
> _________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM
> Subject: [OM] OM2S- more reliable than OM4?
>
>
> > The other day, someone was saying that the OM-4 and OM-PC can act up
> (electrically) for no apparent reason. Those are the two bodies I own
> because I need to be able to meter with 1600 film and dial in underexposure
> compensation. > > Are you guys saying that the OM-2S is more reliable than the
> 4? I'm working towards fewer bodies so, would the 2S be a more reliable body
> to
> standardize on than the 4? > > My memory of it was that the 2S, 4, and PC are
> similar under the shells. If all of the boards are of the same vintage, does
> anyone have an idea about what makes the 2S more reliable than the 4 and PC?
> > >
> Lama, > former owner of these: OM-1 (pre-n), OM-2n. > >
---------
2003 Jun 28-30 in Ottawa:
http://www.CanadianCameraConference.ca
tOM Trottier, ICQ:57647974 http://abacurial.com
758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
+1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115 N45.412 W75.714
"The moment one gives close attention to anything,
even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious,
awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself --
Henry Miller, 1891-1980
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|