Having both, i would definitely say that the 135 is much nicer, but i think
this might be a FL consideration as the DOF is much more shallow.
i did make a photo recently where the hexagon highlights did show up using
the 135. they were reflections in the water from the light source above.
not very distracting, but certainly interesting. i will try to get a scan.
however, see this one for the hex-highlights on the 80/4:
http://www.nothingrhymeswithorange.com/gries/Asides/MA-FL-01.jpg
Bob
<snip>
Was it definitely the 135 and not the 90/2? I did a comparison
between the 80/4 and 90/2. If it was the 135 then I must have missed
that during a hiatus from the list.
Giles
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
