Ohboy....do I sense another "serial-number-quest" comming up? It
could be a really helpfull idea to try and figure out roughly the
cut-off-sn of "plastic vs. metal" for these lenses. I'll look at mine
when I am done with what seems to be an inhuman workload (it's past
midnight friday night, and I am still working...)
--thomas
On Fri, 16 May 2003 15:06:30 -0700
Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Both my E.Zuiko SC 135/3.5, ser 2377xx and Zuiko MC 135/2.8, ser
> 1772xx, have the slit you describe and both have the plastic frame.
> The frame is in perfect condition on both, as well :-) .
>
> Moose
>
> clintonr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> >
> >> In seriousness, any way in which I easilly can identify if my
> >135mm's are of the "plastic frame" version or not?>
> >>
> >
> >It's tough, but possible -- maybe! If you turn the distance ring
> >out all the way and look inside the rear of the lens, the parts
> >book shows that the black metal light baffle around the inside of
> >the lens mount of the type with the plastic insert has a narrow
> >rectangular slot cut into it about half way down. Except for
> >that, I don't see much if anything different between their outward
> >apearance.
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|