At the moment, I actually own all three of these lenses. Sad to say, but
soon I'll only own the non-Zuiko pair.
Weird for me :)
Course, the 60-300 is off somewhere else shooting baseball. I don't even
like baseball.
Tom
> There are some excellent alternatives outside the Zuiko line. Here are
> comparisons of a couple of excellent lenses to the 65-200. The Tamron
> gives much greater reach and exceptional macro capability, but is a bit
> longer and heavier. The Tokina is smaller, lighter and has much greater
> fl coverage. I wouldn't mention this if the 65-200 were a winner, but
> sheesh, why back a lame horse.
>
> Tamron SP Zuiko Tokina AT-X
> Speed f3.8-5.4 f4 f3.5-4.5
> Focal Len. 60-300 65-200 35-200
> Length Min 166 147 124
> Diameter 68 71 70
> Weight 870 730 680
> Filter size 62 55 67
> Close focus 1.9 1.2 (0.85) 2.1
> Max. Macro 1:1.55 1:3.3 1:3.8
>
> Moose
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|