Should work great, maybe even better than the 300/2.8. The weight
will be the problem, though. I'm not certain, but I bet the 250/2
is heavier than the 300/2.8.
Of course, that's just a guess, 'cause not only don't I have any
of the Zuiko f/2's longer than the 100/2, but I ain't ever even
seen one. Maybe Tom can let me have the other 180/2 so I'll know
what it's like and won't feel deprived and underprivileged.
Enviously,
Walt
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:02:22 -0400
>Walt,
>
>Thanks.
>
>I have a 250/2 which focuses to 7 feet. Should I try some
>extension on that?
>
>Matt
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|