Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re:

Subject: [OM] Re:
From: John and Julie Ockman <jrockman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:11:13 -0400
How did this get through with out the [OM} getting tacked on by the list
software? I use the [OM] to sort my mail.
Regards,
John

Giles wrote:
> 
> Ratings of Zuiko 28/2 and comparable lenses from a German Magazine
> 
> Lens            Res.    Contrast        Centering       Distortion
>         Vignetting      Total
> Zuiko 28/2      18.9    23.1            18              8
>         9               77
> Canon EF 28/1.8 18.3    22.8            16              8
>         9               74.1
> Minolta AF 28/2 19.1    23.4            16              9
>         9               76.6
> Nikkor AF 28/1.418.6    23.1            17              8
>         8               74.7
> Sigma AF 28/1.8 15.6    19.1            14              8
>         6               62.7
> Asph II ZEN
> 
> (figures courtesy Richard Schaetzl )
> 
> Giles
> 
> >  Finally I
> >just keeping the F2, not great but there is no better choice for Zuiko
> >28, IMO all Zuiko 28 are not that great.
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz