Subject: | RE: [OM] zuiko 28mm 2.8 or 3.5 |
---|---|
From: | Giles <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:19:45 +0100 |
You are right.My apologies CH, I should not have quoted numbers as a rejoinder to an opinion. Giles He did say 'IMO'..... -----Original Message----- From: Giles Gary Reese commented in his tests that the 28/2 was one of the sharpest Zuikos.Finally I just keeping the F2, not great but there is no better choice for Zuiko>28, IMO all Zuiko 28 are not that great. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] again lens case for ZUIKO fisheye 16mm, Christoph Berndt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] RE: Film/digital Wars[OT], Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] zuiko 28mm 2.8 or 3.5, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] zuiko 28mm 2.8 or 3.5, Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |