If you can't get a stunning 8x10 out of 35mm, then you need a new processor!
Even scans of 35mm negs on an inkjet are stunning. Is 6x7 better? Maybe,
but 35mm is still impressive.
Heck, even the E20 makes amazing 8x10.
Tom
> Skip Williams wrote:
>
> >There are lots of discussion on that over at photo.net.
> >
> >Also look at http://medfmt.8k.com
> >
> >I found a nice, and revealing review of the Mamiya 6 and 7 at
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mf.htm
> >
> >Skip
> >
> >
> >
> Hmm.. The guy gives good arguements for 6x6, but I've looked at some
> 6x7 pages, that give equally as good arguements, namely no cropping for
> 8x10's. This in and of itself means a near "waste-free" use on 8x10's.
> And unlike 35mm's where you don't always print 8x10, in 6x7's, printing
> to 8x10's is a lot more common.
>
> Thanks for pointing me in that direction though, great reading..
>
> Albert
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|