ML Archiv: Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense

from Steve Goss

Subject:	Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense
From:	Steve Goss <stevegoss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:05:30 -0500

No, "Owed two ah spill chucker"...

Steve Goss

Andrew Gullen wrote:

"Owed to a Spellchecker" ?

Andrew

Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:50:05 +1200
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The Spellcheckers Poem




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense, Brian Swale Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense, Chris Barker Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense, Andrew Gullen Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense, Steve Goss <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Looking for a big brother for my OM.., Jim Brokaw
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Ebay Jerks and Weasels, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Plu; not so perfect tense, Andrew Gullen
Next by Thread:	[OM] AN glass negative carriers? (No OM), R. Jackson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]