Subject: | Re: [OM] Digilog vs Anotal |
---|---|
From: | Paul Laughlin <pelaughlin@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 03 Apr 2003 09:39:59 -0800 |
You might find the article by Jeff Shewe in the current PEI magazine to be
interesting. He uses a Canon EOS 1Ds with the same lenses that he used on
the 35mm camera for his test shots. His conclusion is that the digital
surpasses the analog in this case.
Paul in Portland OR < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photo Printer, Tris Schuler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM; now *way* OT] So digital can do it all?, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Digilog vs Anotal, AG Schnozz |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digilog vs Anotal, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |