Subject: | Re: [OM] Rod Planck Seminar, Nikon VR |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:30:58 -0800 |
Hey, the link is working now. Nice pics. The second one is a scene where
coating probably doesn't make any difference except for low transmittace
increasing the exposure needed a bit.
It looks like the lack of coating works to your advantage in the first
image with the really spectacular halo around the street lamp. What's
with the tuba hanging over the wires on the right? Mood an subject make
it look like an image shot when the lens was new.
Moose Dizel wrote: <snip>Ahh.. Delights of manual cameras.. BTW (warning! non-Oly content!!) - even a uncoated, universally disliked lens from before WWII can work beautifully..:http://watteau.neurosoft.net/flare/summar.jpg http://watteau.neurosoft.net/flare/summar2.jpg < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Poor man's 35-80/2.8 for cheap., Walt Wayman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Ebay OM prices, Clemente Colayco |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Rod Planck Seminar, Nikon VR, ll . clark |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Rod Planck Seminar, Nikon VR, Donald Shedrick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |