Don't tell me that! I heard the 200/5 was a bit of a dog and the 200/4 was
fairly nice, so I just bought a 200/4.
Gary Reese's tests seem to indicate an approximate draw, with perhaps an
edge to the 200/4, though it may not be significant.
Andrew
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:21:26 -0500
> From: lamadoo@xxxxxxxx
> ...
> There's a lot of agreement that the 200/5 is a honey of a lens, and since I
> can't recommend the 200/4 I had, they're probably right.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|