Not really comparable. You have to pay to develop all the slides to find
the 'keepers'. With digital, the losers cost nothing but the time to
view and reject them. So the cost depends on the ratio of keepers in
your photography.
Moose
Gareth.J.Martin wrote:
Out of interest does anyone know what the costs would be to make
hardcopies of 2160 (assuming Jez used 36 exposures per roll of his +60
rolls of Velvia) digital images of the same quality as the Velvia
slides? I know the two cases aren't exactly comparable but I'm just
curoius!
All the best,
Gareth.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|