To Frank Van L and Wayne Harridge and R. Jackson;
Frank: You're so out of it, you don't know what's going on in England,
never mind the USA. Try reading this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/2862325.stm
which points out the HUGE majority that just supported Blair today. In
England. In the Parliament. Incidentally, the American gov't has done the
same, with an even greater margin. And most Americans are behind this.
There's a war on now, and you should get behind your troops. (You too,
Wayne.) You don't want to give comfort to the enemy, do you?
Oh, and BTW, Frank, what is your opinion of the IRA while we're at it? Huh?
Compare and contrast that to 9/11, wide-eyed little girls on airplanes with
sliced-up and bleeding stewardesses and aimed at the World Trade, gassed
Kurd women and children, blown up embassies, blown up shopping centers,
blown up naval vessels, 1 million dead Iranians, another million dead
Iraqis, thousands of raped women, mutilated women, repressed women, murdered
men, and on and on.
The next SOB who compares Bush to the people responsible for this stuff ...
well we don't wanna go there so ... you should see a good shrink. And if
you're an American you should be arrested and tried for sedition. And you
could be after the bombs start falling.
Rob:
"disregard for civilian human life that our administration does."
What the hell are you talking about. Are you stoned? have you the slightest
clue of what's going on on this planet? Any historical context to enable you
to speak of Mao or Napolean or Stalin or Hitler or Bush. It appears not. Go
back to lurking. Please don't jump out of your dark hiding place too often.
Your thoughts are scary.
Wayne:
Usually Aussies seem to see things realistically. I guess there are
exceptions to every rule.
That's it. No more. Just OM for me from now on, I swear. Everyone can just
use your imagination as to what my responses would be to any posts that this
draws. I'm going to patiently wait another 24 hours. I just wish they could
televise whatever the Iraqi people end up doing to Saddam and Uday and
Umpt-ay and it-shay and all his other sons.
The party's over, Hussein. We'll turn out the lights for ya.
George
>
> >Of course Saddam Hussein must leave stage ASAP, but please could we
> >get rid of Bush and Blair immediately afterwards?
>
> How does this square with what you just got through saying? It's Bush and
> Blair and Spain (and Portugal and Australia and Poland and
> Bulgaria, that I
> know of for sure) who have said "Enough's enough!" and are now
> pursuing the
> only means I can think of to get Saddam Hussein to "leave stage ASAP" as
> you put it. Do you imagine this monster would exit stage left willingly?
> And with what? A huff and a puff and an apology for wasting
> everyone's time?
>
> You want to have your cake and to eat it, too, don't you?
>
> Tris
>
> P.S. "Most" Americans support this action, in spite of your ignorance to
> the contrary. Every poll I've seen following the president's address last
> night gives the same result on that (indeed, were giving the same result
> long before the president delivered his ultimatum).
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|