| Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: Expensive camera, cheap film??? |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:58:04 -0500 |
Maybe he meant Kodak Max 400. Andrew >> Refuses to buy something better then Tmax 400 for his vacation trips... >> Err... Cost difference between say Reala or Provia vs Tmax? $1-$2... > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:53:10 -0500 > From: Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tmax400 isn't a second-rate film by any stretch. Was he saying that he didn't > want to use color film for a reason? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Vivitar Series 1 90mm /f2.5 Macro, Gary L. Edwards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] celebrity, William Sommerwerck |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: Expensive camera, cheap film???, Skip Williams |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: [OM] Re: Expensive camera, cheap film???, Wayne Harridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |