ML Archiv: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question.

Olympus-OM

[OM] OT hypothetical (?) question.

from Timpe, Jim

Subject:	[OM] OT hypothetical (?) question.
From:	"Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:58:49 -0800

Which would you buy.  Comparable money.  User 21/2 (would be KEH bargain),
or near new 180/2.8.

And please, don't be a smart you know what and say 'both'.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Timpe, Jim <= Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Tom Scales Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Pschings RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Tom Scales RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., ll . clark RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., jowilcox RE: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Timpe, Jim

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: 250 Film Back Question, Tom Scales
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Sunpak 120 J TTL or other bare bulb flash opinions...., John A. Lind
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: 250 Film Back Question, Jan Steinman
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT hypothetical (?) question., Tom Scales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]