I was at a Leica seminar two years ago shooting with my OM4t and 35-80/2.8 as I
don't have a Leica SLR. When people looked at the slides on the screen, many
were eager to know which Leica lens that I had used. Of course, I told them
the truth. Several people noted that the 35-80/2.8 has a understandably great
reputation.
Skip
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [OM] Expensive camera, cheap film???
> From: Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:28:48 +0800
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>No... But I showed them Leica users up today ;-) The M7 owner thought
>my pics were sharper and better.. He muttered something like "Wow,
>Leicas produce great work" and then I had to tear his house of cards
>down and say "Actually, this was shot on an Olympus OM..."
>
>;-)
>
>Albert
>
>>>OK, I was at a L*ica store today, and two things happened that just
>>>amazed me.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Infidel!
>>
>>Now, having gotten that off my chest, did you get the M7? ;-)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Saso
>>
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|